Flush 2006 - Ready for F8, MX2004 and MX
PHP5 (final release) - more fun with xml
Adding jsfl support to scite-editor
Extend the scite-editor - open files within localhost
Integrating context sensitiv help in scite editor
Using Robin Debreuil's Flush.exe with macromedia flash mx 2004
[OT] phpinfo on first april, lol
AS2: user-class-mc and attachMovie - nice trick...
Windows XP Home - Shared Folders
Good news for MoveableType-Users

January 2006
July 2004
April 2004
January 2004
December 2003
October 2003
August 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003

Andre Michelle
Arul Kumaran
Barber's Pole
Danielle Ugoletti
Darron Schall
Eric D
Florian Krüsch
Guy Watson
Greg Burch
Ralf Bokelberg
Jabby Panda
Jean-François Bastien
Jesse Warden
Marcel Weilacher
Mike Chambers
Okyere
Oscar Trelles
Peter Elst
Peter Joel
Quasimondo
WaxPraxis
Zoode.org

ActionScript Cookbook
Test-Driven Development
Refactoring
Design Patterns
ActionScript for Flash MX - The Definitive Guide
Object-Oriented Programming with ActionScript
Programming C Sharp

www.moveabletype.org (blog)
www.voisen.org (MTCodeBeautifier)
www.bradchoate.com (MTMacro)
www.beautifier.org (beautifier)

www.ritzelmut.de
Kreuzfahrt
Fussballwetten

I have just asked me which Provider for Macromedia-Flash Communication
Server would be good choice. I found several FlashCom-Providers by
searching google:

http://media3.net/
http://www.mediatemple.net/
http://www.influxis.com/
http://www.flashcomhosting.com/
http://www.uvault.com/
http://www.moremx.com/

The Prices for a Webspace which supports FlashCom ranges between
10$ to 600$. According to that the Features ranges. So if you take an
cheap one, you will have insufficient bandwith and max. simultaneous
connections to build an rich-internet-application with realtime streaming
sound and video for many people.
Ok, we could pay more and will get more, but is the price worth at the
moment?

...no.

For a developer, the free version is great for coding, but not true QA testing. I can test many users on the one I have at Mediatemple (10), and the bandwidth is fine for what I need. Additionally, assuming you have a client who fronts the money for a full version, they'll be paying the hosting for upwards of 10 users, so it's not your money.

The problem is, for personal stuff, there is just no way. I'm currently developing a Flashcom based app for Central and knowing the above, I'm providing a way for people to "donate" connections. They can input their rtmp address with connections they are willing to donate.

Thanks for your comment.
I hope that FlashCom-Hosting becomes cheaper,
so that also personel, non-commercial applications
will be possible.

I do too. Flashcom is sooooo much cooler than XMLSocket.